Where is rescan scsi bus.sh

A lot could happen in that time : Good to know it isn't a functional problem. Thank you for investigation. See full activity log. To post a comment you must log in. Report a bug.

This report contains Public information Edit Everyone can see this information. You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications. Other bug subscribers Subscribe someone else. Bug attachments ProcCpuinfoMinimal. Unassigned Edit. You need to log in to change this bug's status. Affecting: sg3-utils Ubuntu. Affecting: sg3-utils Ubuntu Bionic. Assigned to.

Lucas Kanashiro lucaskanashiro wrote on :. LUN ID which has been detected in the server, can be verified by using ls command as below. To use the rescan-scsi-bus. If not installed, run the following command to install it. October 6, October 4, October 4, September 29, September 29, The question is, is there a better policy to re-scanning disks rather than running a gambit of rescan-scsi-bus.

The requirement here is a single command which removes disks and disk paths which have been removed, adds disks and paths which are new, updates drives which have been remapped somewhere else, picks up changes in drives that have new sizes and runs in a reasonable amount of time seconds on ANY linux distribution regardless of the amount of disks or level of IO load the system is under.

I could go back to echoing values into sysfs, but that kind of defeats the whole make it simple and have a single command which runs that does it all in a timely fashion.

Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Ask Question. Asked 2 years, 10 months ago. Active 2 years, 6 months ago. Viewed 1k times. I've been plauged for some time by various facets of re-scanning disks in Linux. Example: If the disk was removed..

Even though we aren't syncing, rescan can still hang unless we remove the disks first. Don't know why the last command can't do it at the same time..